LINKS
|
DogLogz.Com |
Elephant Brains |
Business By The Sea |
Talk FREE |
Dog Pile Search Engine |
Americans need to plan
"as you would for other public health emergencies"
regarding the H5N1 Flu virus,
as stated by the
U.S. Health and Human Services
Secretary: Mike Leavitt
is an answer to the bird flu virus.
Silver kills most pathogenic viruses and bacteria ON CONTACT!
No Pathogenic virus or bacteria has ever been proven to mutate and become immune to silver.
So why haven’t the ‘authorities’ endorsed Colloidal Silver?
For
the same reason they ignore colloidal silver in the treatment of many other
viral complaints – because you cannot patent colloidal silver,
if anyone
wanted to they could make it in their kitchen – so there is no profit for
BigPharma
(the
major drug companies) – and there is BIG money in patented drugs.
But colloidal silver works
better than most antibiotics,
indeed it was the antibiotic of choice until
1938,
when they ‘patented’ penicillin, and started the ‘gold rush’ of
profits for their shareholders.
So the ‘authorities’ must
choose to ignore colloidal silver, or face the ‘wrath’ of the drug industry.
You must decide whether you
will also ignore this simple, but highly effective, virus
killer.
Avian bird flu looks set to
become an unpleasant reality for us.
The moment this virus manages to cross
the barrier to become a human virus,
allowing it to pass from human to
human, we can expect it to reach
every corner of the globe
that a domestic airline travels to, in a very short time.
The overall projections allow a 'worst case' scenario of 150,000,000 dead
worldwide.
That's a whole lot of
humanitY.
We cannot (at this
stage) say whether Colloidal Silver will defeat this virus for obvious
reasons.
Firstly were we to do so we would receive a visit from the
'officials' involved in medical science,
but mainly because to date this
virus has not made that (official) transition from an avian flu
to
a human variety, so Colloidal Silver has not been tested against this threat.
But it will be,
and we believe it will minimise this virus's dangers for those who use
it.
Strange to think that just six years ago a $20 billion monthly
trade deficit seemed impossible.
But in 2003, the trade gap consistently ran
at twice that amount, including a $42.5 billion deficit in December.
For all
of 2003, the trade gap hit another yearly record, widening to $489 billion.
Will 2004 bring a new high-water mark?
